IGLOO RELOADED REVIEW – DISCOUNT AND HUGE BONUS
Official site: https://goo.gl/Juoyx6
Pyschological warfare?
I believe there’s an element of psychological warfare going on in the area of igloo reloaded review. Google’s representatives have stated that they do everything they can to avoid innocent Web sites being penalized for having bad links pointing to them, yet at the same time Google says that sites could be penalized for having bad links pointing to them. Those two statements are hard to reconcile; if my competitor’s site can be penalized for bad links pointing to it, then can’t I just pay a firm a few hundred bucks to point the spammiest possible links at the site? Yes, says Google! . . . No, says Google! I can’t help feeling that Google is attempting to scare Webmasters into two things. First, not creating spammy links pointing to their sites; second, telling Google where the spammy links are! If Google sends thousands of “bad link” messages to Webmasters and encourages them to use the Disavow Links tool, and if thousands of Webmasters send Google, via the Disavow Links
tool, thousands of text files containing information about millions of bad links . . . that’s fantastic information for Google! And the proof is in the pudding. Over the last few years, Google has become
much better at identifying sites that are in the business of selling links. In fact, I wish Google had been doing something like this — Manual Action messages and the Disavow Links tool — years ago (Google’s Matt Cutts has stated that they made a mistake in letting the “spammy links” problem go on too long). For years, by default, Google encouraged Webmasters to buy links of various
kinds, it encouraged the creation of igloo reloaded review. Creating spammy links worked, so an entire industry grew up to help Web sites rank well by creating garbage links. If your competitor was beating you in the search ranks by buying links . . . well, if you can’t beat ‘em, join ‘em! Today, I think that some of the action around links is more intended to scare you and elicit information about bad links than it is really related to a direct penalty. If you receive a Manual Action message about links, has a penalty really been applied? Or is Google just fishing for information? In some cases, I
think it may be the latter. Dealing with “Algorithmic Actions”
What if you have no Manual Action message? What if you have gone through all the checks in this chapter and are sure that your site has been penalized? You’re working blind, in effect. Even if you fix the problems there’s no reconsideration request available to you; that’s reserved for manual actions. All you can do is fix the problems and wait for Google to reindex your igloo reloaded review and (perhaps) remove the penalty.
If you’ve been dropped from Google’s index, the first thing to consider is whether you have, in effect, told Google to drop your site. I’ve seen this happen on a number of occasions, and the mistake can be minor. A few mistyped characters in your robots.txt file, for instance, can tell Google that you don’t want to be indexed. (I’ve even seen a site sabotaged by someone intentionally changing the robots. txt file.) I recommend that you start by checking your robots.txt file (see Chapter 7 for more about this file), in particular the Disallow lines. For instance, the following is fine:
User-agent: *
Disallow: /includes/
On the other hand, the following removes your site from the search engines:
User-agent: *
Disallow: /
A small, simple mistake, and you’re dead in the water!
Google Webmaster account (see Chapter 13) provides some nice tools that help you check your existing robots.txt file. First, there’s the Blocked Resources report. Click the Google Index menu link, then select Blocked Resources; this report will tell you whether anything on your site is being
blocked by robots.txt. There’s also the robots.txt tester. Click the Crawl menu link and then the
robots.txt Tester link. This tool lets you enter a particular URL to see whether it’s blocked, and also enter the text of your robots.txt file and test it. You can even request that Google quickly re-crawl your robots.txt file if you’ve modified it. Note that you can also block search engines using the robots meta tags in individual pages. If, for instance, you have the following:
<META NAME="robots" CONTENT="noindex">
you’ve just told the search engines not to index that page.
These are the most common problems, although there are other, far less likely, possibilities, such as the server being unresponsive to search engines. (You would have that problem only if you have a particularly incompetent or malicious server administrator, but it definitely happens.) Your Google
Webmaster account can tell you if Google’s having problems accessing your site; select Crawl and then Crawl Errors.
Details:
No comments:
Post a Comment